LDN - Back to homepage
GDPR - Privacy Notice
 
HyperLinkHyperLinkHyperLinkHyperLinkHyperLinkHyperLinkHyperLinkHyperLink
Deadly Link Between Sugar and Cancer

Cancer cells are nasty little anarchists. They go where they shouldn’t, subvert authority, co-opt law-abiding cells around them, and break a ton of biological rules in their mindless quest for destruction.

They’re also weird. And one of the most bizarre examples of their rule breaking is how they metabolize sugar. When oxygen is readily available, as it is in the human body, normal cells break down and extract energy from glucose through a process called oxidation. By way of this biochemical machination, cells can extract 36 molecules of ATP, which is like cash money in the body. (Think of it like Bitcoin: Cells do some complex equation-solving and, as a reward, they get something they can spend.)

But cancer cells (mostly) do lots of biochemical work to get less coin. They break down glucose through an ancient 10-step process called glycolysis—which yields them a mere two molecules of ATP for every one of glucose.

With glycolysis, cells can produce energy even in the absence of oxygen, which is what our primordial slime ancestors had to do. It’s also what anaerobic bacteria and yeasts do. They derive energy from sugar by way of fermentation. But in the presence of oxygen, extracting energy from sugar by glycolysis is the equivalent of ironing your socks: It would seem to involve expending a lot of effort for little benefit.

What’s more, cancer cells need gobs of energy to fuel their mad rebellion; rapid cell division, after all, requires plenty of biochemical fuel. And cancer cells gobble up sugar like nobody’s business. (That’s why we’re often able to see tumors on a PET scan, which highlights tissues that rapidly take up an injected sugar called FDG.)

A German biochemist named Otto Warburg, back in the 1920s, was the first to observe these oddball, counterintuitive facts about cancer cells, which he blamed on a defect in their mitochondria, the cell’s energy factories (and my all-time favorite organelles). Indeed, the biochemist believed this aberrant aerobic glycolysis—which later became known as the “Warburg effect”—actually caused cancer, though it wasn’t clear how or why.

The notion was somewhat forgotten for decades, as researchers focused on other theoretical frameworks for cancer and tried to tease out the genetic mutations that transformed cells and drove the disease. But in recent years, the Warburg effect—and the broader metabolic theory of cancer—has had a reawakening. (For those wanting to learn more about it, my friend Travis Christofferson has written an excellent book on the subject.)


 
 
  Partners
CAWTAR
Hominem
E-Campus
Innovety
Jovesolides
Odessa Law Academy
EP
Formetica
CCAB
ADAPT
Giolli Cooperativa
AlHayat Center
Futuro Digitale
Jordan River Foundation
ILO
SDC
SIDC
BMA
Global Fund for Children
MENAHRA
RI
UN Habitat
WBI
IREX
Mediter
CSR in action
About us: Who we are | Board | Consultants | Team | Memberships | Client Base | Testimonials | In The Media
Services: Introduction | Consulting | Training | Planning | Activities: Events | Projects
Workshops | News: Articles | Reports | Insights | Interviews
Gallery | Job Market: CVs | Jobs | F.A.Q. | Links | Guestbook | Directory | Contact



Design and Development by ITEC - Innovative Technology